DSpace Repository

Understanding The Argumentation Structure Of Marine Insurance Legal Disputes

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Dung, Phan Minh
dc.contributor.author Basuti, Nischal Srinivas
dc.contributor.other Dailey, Matthew N.
dc.contributor.other Taparugssanagorn, Attaphongse
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-18T04:12:24Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-18T04:12:24Z
dc.date.issued 2021-05
dc.identifier.other AIT
dc.identifier.uri http://www.cs.ait.ac.th/xmlui/handle/123456789/1003
dc.description 28 p. en_US
dc.description.abstract Common law is a legal system where the precedent cases are used to make judicial decisions. Among many countries like America follow this legal system. Legal disputes such as in debt collection matter, the Court analyse to similar cases to take decisions in the case at hand. The court will apply different standards used in other similar cases and make conclusions using those in the new cases. Therefore to understand the logical structure of these law, it is necessary to understand each case that has given rise to such law. In this study, argumentation theory is used to analyse and understand the logical structure of cases in typical marine insurance legal disputes of the US. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher AIT en_US
dc.subject Marine Insurance en_US
dc.subject Argumentation Theory en_US
dc.title Understanding The Argumentation Structure Of Marine Insurance Legal Disputes en_US
dc.type Research report en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


My Account